Campos electromagnéticos pulsados y ozono en el tratamiento de la artrosis de rodilla en el adulto mayor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields as treatment for arthrosis of the knee and combination of these with intra-joint infiltration of ozone in elderly patients. Method: A longitudinal and prospective study was performed in 90 patients older than 60 years of age, with clinical and radiological diagnosis of grade II and III knee arthrosis resistant to medical treatment, who attended ozone therapy consultation at the Policlinic Ramp between January and December of 2014. The population was divided in three groups: 1) AINES, Control, Non Steroid Anti-Inflammatory was administered. 2) 10 sessions of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) with a frequency of three per week were administered. 3) 10 sessions of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) with a frequency of three times per week were administered and 10 intraarticular infiltrations with ozone with a frequency of three times per week. All the results were evaluated before and after the treatment the pain perceived by means of the visual analogical scale of the pain (EVA), the intervening functionality was evaluated the administration of the questionnaire WOMAC (The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index): the degree of clinical improvement, the minimal amount of therapy applications to achieve improvement and the incidence of side effects. Results: The protocol used with PEMF therapy for arthrosis of the knee was very superior to the application of AINES with a statistically important difference (p=0, 00) and the results were even better when they were combined with intra-joint infiltrations of ozone. In the groups treated with ozone and pulsed electromagnetic fields there were no side effects reported as for in the groups treated with AINES there were gastrointestinal and elevated high blood pressure side effects manifested. Conclusion: Treatments with pulsed electromagnetic fields for arthrosis of the knee grade II and III are safe and effective methods, and potentiate when combined with ozone intra-joint infiltrations
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".