MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2498602747 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316152645.005

Council of Canadians and Others <i>v</i>. The Queen in Right of Canada

2008· article· en· W2498602747 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLaw, logistics, and international trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisdictionTreatyLawPolitical scienceInternational lawInterpretation (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

335 Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Effect in municipal law — Whether North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”) part of Canada’s municipal law — Whether NAFTA attracting the application of Section 96 of the Constitution Act 1867 — Distinction between parliamentary approval and incorporation of a treaty — Whether North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act 1993 incorporating NAFTA into municipal law Treaties — Interpretation — Investor-State procedures in NAFTA Chapter 11 — Investor establishing State responsibility of Party for claim — International nature of obligations under NAFTA Chapter 11 — Whether use of Canadian constitutional values and principles to interpret international treaties at odds with international law regarding treaty interpretation International tribunals — Jurisdiction — Whether NAFTA Chapter 11 granting exclusive jurisdiction to NAFTA tribunals — Whether NAFTA tribunals having jurisdiction to invalidate municipal laws or government practices — NAFTA tribunals addressing treaty obligations and international commitments — Adjudication of treaty rights and obligations by Canadian courts — The law of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicLaw, logistics, and international tradeFrench-language works237,207