MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2498845332 · doi:10.1057/9780230101272_7

Mary Elizabeth Braddon in Paris: The Cross-Chunnel Relations of Periodical Sensational Literature in the 1870s–1880s

2009· book-chapter· en· W2498845332 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alberto Gabriele

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbezzlementCousinQuarter (Canadian coin)EveningArtHistoryArt historyChinaCartographyLawGeographyPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T he setting: “the quietest road” in the Marais quarter in Paris— rue St Gilles, “where gossip flourishes as rankly as the grass between the paving-stones.” The time: a Saturday evening, April 27, 1872. A man of thirty is noticed in the area as he wanders from door to door seeking information about the house of M. Vincent Favoral, supposedly for a cousin of his who is considering a job offer as a cook in the mansion of M. Favoral, at number 38 of rue St Gilles, “an old type of house, not so common anymore, that the housing market values at 1200 francs per square meter.” M. Favoral is chief cashier and one of the principal shareholders at Mutual Credit Bank, an institution that, “sprung up with the Second Empire, won heavily on the bourse the day the Coup d’État was played on the street.” While he sits at dinner entertaining his guests for the evening, he is interrupted by M. de Thaller, an elegant baron, who takes him to another room for an animated conversation. All money in the bank is lost, the police wait outside of the house to arrest him for forgery and embezzlement. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0180.021
Scholarly communication0.0130.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207