MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2498871550 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.160466

Giant Cell Arteritis: Visual Loss Is Our Major Concern

2016· letter· en· W2498871550 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Miguel Á. González‐Gay, Santos Castañeda, Javier Llorca

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGiant cell arteritisOptic nerveIschemic optic neuropathyOptic neuropathyAnterior ischemic optic neuropathyVasculitisCiliary arteriesContext (archaeology)Central retinal arteryOptic discCentral retinal artery occlusionRetinal vasculitisOphthalmologyOphthalmic arteryVisual acuityPathologyRetinalRadiologyBlood flowDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis in Western countries among individuals 50 years and older1. This medium and large-vessel granulomatous vasculitis typically affects the extracranial branches of the carotid artery1. Common features of the disease such as headache or jaw claudication are the result of vasculitic involvement of arteries derived from the external carotid artery. However, visual manifestations, including visual loss — the most feared complications of this vasculitis — are generally due to the arteritic damage affecting the ophthalmic branches of the internal carotid artery2. The most common ophthalmic manifestation of GCA is anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, which is caused by interruption of blood flow in the posterior ciliary arteries to the optic nerve head. The clinical picture is described as sudden painless loss of vision3. Visual loss may present as a mist in all or part of the visual field and evolve within 24 to 48 hours to total blindness. Unilateral visual loss may be initially unnoticed by the patient until, by chance, the unaffected eye is covered. One eye is affected first, but involvement of the other eye in untreated patients may occur 1 to 10 days after the initial event4. In the acute phase of anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, the optic disc is pale and swollen, but the retina is almost normal. Afterward, optic nerve atrophy associated with optic disc cupping is observed. Less commonly, visual loss is caused by central retinal artery occlusion, ischemic retrobulbar neuropathy or occipital infarction in the context of a stroke involving the vertebrobasilar territory2. When the arteritic process involves the central retinal artery leading to retinal stroke, the retina is damaged primarily and it appears greyish and swollen, and a contrasting red zone can be … Address correspondence to Prof. M.A. González-Gay, Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, c/ Avenida de Valdecilla s/n, 39008, Santander, Spain. E-mail: miguelaggay{at}hotmail.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207