Bibliographic record
Abstract
What is at stake…is a big idea: a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind – peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. George H. W. Bush, 1991 Like George Bush, I was of a generation that embraced wholeheartedly the concept of a Pax Americana. James A. Baker III, 1995 When the Reagan phase of the Cold War ended with a weakened Soviet Union, the discourse about security among policymakers and defense intellectuals, inside the Washington Beltway and at think tanks and universities around the nation, sounded decidedly triumphalist. Protective as ever of his and Nixon's policies and mindful of their legacy, Henry Kissinger continued to chide the critics of détente, in effect refusing to admit that the very word had become anathema for political reasons. Meanwhile, the imperative to contain potential adversaries remained at the very heart of strategic thinking in America. In that respect, containment in some form might survive as a useful tactic even after the Soviet empire finally collapsed. The Carter and Reagan administrations had accepted the contradictory premises underlying strategic globalism: The application of American power was limited, yet the responsibility to act as the guarantor of order was global in scope. Kissinger grudgingly celebrated Reagan's achievements vis-à-vis the Soviets, finding in the Californian's actual policies, as distinct from the bellicose rhetoric he had initially employed, vital continuities from his own years in power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.038 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".