MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2499154041 · doi:10.1177/1745691616652873

A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect

2016· article· en· W2499154041 on OpenAlexaff
Martin S. Hagger, Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis, H. Alberts, Calvin Octavianus Anggono, Cédric Batailler, Angela R. Birt, Ralf Brand, Muriele Brand, Gayle Brewer, S. Bruyneel, Dustin P. Calvillo, Wenonah Campbell, Peter Robert Cannon, M. Carlucci, Nicholas P. Carruth, Tracy Cheung, Adrienne Crowell, Denise de Ridder, Siegfried Dewitte, Malte Elson, Jacqueline R. Evans, Anne L. Fay, Bob M. Fennis, Anna J Finley, Zoë Francis, Elke Heise, Harry W. Hoemann, Michael Inzlicht, Sander L. Koole, Lina Koppel, Floor M. Kroese, Florian Lange, Karen Lau, Patricia A. Lynch, Carolien Martijn, Harald Merckelbach, Neil P. Mills, Alexej Michirev, Akira Miyake, A. Mosser, Megan D. Muise, Dominique Müller, M Gallinella Muzi, Dario Nalis, Ratri Nurwanti, Henry Otgaar, Michael Philipp, Pierpaolo Primoceri, Katrin Rentzsch, Lara Jade Ringos, Caroline Schlinkert, Brandon J. Schmeichel, Sarah F. Schoch, Maarten Schrama, Astrid Schütz, Angelos Stamos, Gustav Tinghög, Johannes Ullrich, Michelle R. vanDellen, Supra Wimbarti, Wanja Wolff, Cleoputri Yusainy, Oulmann Zerhouni, M. Zwienenberg

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives on Psychological Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Research Topics
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
FundersAssociation for Psychological Science
KeywordsEgo depletionPsychologyReplication (statistics)Id, ego and super-egoSocial psychologyCognitive psychologyDevelopmental psychologySelf-control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.061
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.191
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0610.191
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.009
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainReproducibility
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,113
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives on Psychological Science→Same topicMental Health Research Topics→French-language works237,207→