MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2499530894 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22625

Magnetic demulsifier prepared by using one‐pot reaction and its performance for treating oily wastewater

2016· article· en· W2499530894 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shenwen Fang, Ying Zhu, Bin Chen, Yan Xiong, Ming Duan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDemulsifierFourier transform infrared spectroscopyMaterials scienceThermogravimetric analysisPolyacrylamideChemical engineeringAdsorptionPolymerFerricNuclear chemistryChemistryPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryEmulsionComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, a magnetic demulsifier, called M‐DMEA, was prepared by “one‐pot” synthesis through the pyrolysis of ferric triacetylacetonate (Fe(acac)3) in DMEA 1231, which is a type of polyether demulsifier used in oil fields. The morphologies and phase compositions of the M‐DMEA nanoparticles were determined by transmission electron microscopy and X‐ray diffraction, respectively. The presence of surface coating was confirmed by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and thermogravimetric analyses (TGA). Magnetic property was measured by vibrating sample magnetometer. The demulsification of M‐DMEA for treating oily wastewater produced from polymer flooding (OWPF) was investigated. It was found that the oil removal of M‐DMEA reached 96.0 % at the concentration of 4.0 g/L. In addition, M‐DMEA can be recycled and reused by using an external magnet. The results showed that there was a significant decrease in the oil removal after two cycles because the polymer residue remaining in OPWF, namely partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM), was adsorbed onto the surface of M‐DMEA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207