MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2499888674 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316403594.004

Oil on troubled waters: the consequences of civil liability

2016· book-chapter· en· W2499888674 on OpenAlexaff
Allan C. Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicProperty Rights and Legal Doctrine
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiabilityDoctrineForensic engineeringLaw and economicsLegal liabilityLawPolitical scienceBusinessEngineeringSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Everyone makes mistakes or acts carelessly. Most of the time, the error is harmless and life goes on much as normal. But, at other times, a small slip can result in large and harmful consequences; injuries can be widespread and damage can be catastrophic. While the common law has long had a set of rules that holds careless individuals responsible for their negligent acts, it continues to wrestle with the thorny question of whether they should be liable for all or only some of the damage that they cause. For example, someone might inadvertently drop a still-lit cigarette stub in a waste bin that results in a fire that burns down a whole district and kills many people. In legal doctrine, this is known as ‘the remoteness of damage’ problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicProperty Rights and Legal DoctrineFrench-language works237,207