MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2500679419 · doi:10.4187/respcare.04452

Modalities and Complications Associated With the Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula: Experience in a Pediatric ICU

2016· article· en· W2500679419 on OpenAlexaff
Florent Baudin, Sébastien Gagnon, Benjamin Crulli, François Proulx, Philippe Jouvet, Guillaume Émériaud

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiratory Care · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersSociété de Réanimation de Langue Française
KeywordsMedicineNasal cannulaPneumothoraxChest radiographAnesthesiaChest tubePneumomediastinumRetrospective cohort studyInterquartile rangeSurgeryCannulaRadiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is increasingly used in pediatric ICUs as an intermediate level of support between conventional oxygen delivery and noninvasive ventilation (NIV). The safety of HFNC has seldom been studied, and some cases of barotrauma have been reported. This retrospective study aims to describe HFNC use in a tertiary care pediatric ICU, with a focus on the complications associated with this therapy. METHODS: Between January 2013 and January 2014, all children <18 y old treated with HFNC in the pediatric ICU were included. Demographic data, HFNC settings, chest radiograph reports, and blood gas values were gathered from the electronic medical records. Episodes of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and significant epistaxis were noted. Pneumothorax was distinguished from chest tube-related air leak (frequent after cardiac surgery), which was defined as a small pneumothorax with no clinical impact that resolved spontaneously after chest tube removal. RESULTS: During the 1-y study period, there were 177 HFNC episodes, involving 145 subjects with a median (interquartile range) age of 8 (2-28) months. HFNC was used as primary support in 31% of episodes, after extubation in 36% and after NIV in 18%. HFNC was administered exclusively for nitric oxide delivery in 16% of episodes. Two children (1%) developed new pneumothoraces that required chest tube insertion, whereas 5 (3%) chest tube-related air leaks were noted. One (0.6%) episode of significant epistaxis was noted. Among 6 preexisting pneumothoraces, none worsened under HFNC. Failure of HFNC occurred in 32 episodes, requiring transition to NIV in 28 cases and endotracheal intubation in 5 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Support with HFNC following a clinical protocol in pediatric ICUs was associated with a relatively low rate of complications. Since HFNC use is increasing, further evidence is needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespiratory CareSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207