On properties of geometric preduals of ${\mathbf C^{k,\omega}}$ spaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Let C_b^{k,\omega}(\mathbb R^n) be the Banach space of C^k functions on \mathbb R^n bounded together with all derivatives of order \le k and with derivatives of order k having moduli of continuity O(\omega) for some \omega\in C(\mathbb R_+) . Let C_b^{k,\omega}(S):=C_b^{k,\omega}(\mathbb R^n)|_S be the trace space to a closed subset S\subset\mathbb R^n . The geometric predual G_b^{k,\omega}(S) of C_b^{k,\omega}(S) is the minimal closed subspace of the dual (C_b^{k,\omega}(\mathbb R^n))^* containing evaluation functionals of points in S . We study geometric properties of spaces G_b^{k,\omega}(S) and their relations to the classical Whitney problems on the characterization of trace spaces of C^k functions on \mathbb R^n . In particular, we show that each G_b^{k,\omega}(S) is a complemented subspace of G_b^{k,\omega}(\mathbb R^n) , describe the structure of bounded linear operators on G_b^{k,\omega}(\mathbb R^n) , prove that G_b^{k,\omega}(S) has the bounded approximation property and that in some cases space C_b^{k,\omega}(S) is isomorphic to the second dual of its subspace consisting of restrictions to S of C^\infty(\mathbb R^n) functions with compact supports.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".