MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2500859639 · doi:10.1109/icc.2016.7511035

Header length reduction for bloom filter multicast using stochastic overlay networks

2016· article· en· W2500859639 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Craig, Biswajit Nandy, Ioannis Lambadaris

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticastComputer scienceComputer networkSource-specific multicastBloom filterProtocol Independent MulticastPacket forwardingDistance Vector Multicast Routing ProtocolXcastDistributed computingIP multicastForwarding planeNetwork packetPragmatic General Multicast

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bloom filter based multicast is a methodology in which bloom filters are used to implement a source routing approach to multicast forwarding, with the goal of addressing forwarding element memory scalability issues in traditional IP multicast deployments. These techniques face their own scalability issues with large multicast group sizes, or networks with a high degree of node interconnectivity, as the necessary bloom filters may be too large to be practically inserted in packet headers. In this work we contribute a technique by which a centralized network controller may leverage stochastically generated overlay networks to reduce the length of in-packet bloom filters used for multicast packet delivery. We evaluate our technique through simulation of false-positive-free filter generation on representative multicast workloads, and find that it achieves a significant reduction in bloom filter lengths (up to 48% in our best case WAN topology scenario, and up to 89% in our best case regular grid topology scenario). Our technique is appropriate for deployment in software defined networks, where the control plane of the network is logically centralized in a network controller, and our technique may be applied with minimal extensions to forwarding hardware.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207