MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2501545529 · doi:10.1057/9780230504127_4

Belief in Steamers: Making Trustworthy the Iron Steamship

2005· book-chapter· en· W2501545529 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ben Marsden, Crosbie Smith

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYankeeGeorge (robot)HistoryCONTESTCrewAncient historyArtEconomic historyArt historyLawArchaeologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carnot’s optimistic appraisal of the civilising and enlightening power of steamships serves as an appropriate epigraph for a chapter on steam at sea in an age of Victorian empire. Thirty years on, however, his faith that steam-powered vessels ‘lessened the dangers of voyages’ would have rung hollow. The year 1854 was a disastrous one both for transatlantic steamships and for iron sailing ships out of Liverpool. On 1 March the iron screw steamer City of Glasgow , constructed on the River Clyde by Tod & Macgregor four years earlier to their own account and now owned by the ambitious Inman Line of Liverpool, left her home port with some 480 passengers and crew bound for Philadelphia. She never arrived. No trace was ever found of a vessel much admired as the exemplar of progress and economy compared to the generously subsidised wooden paddle steamers of the Collins and Cunard lines. Six months later, her larger consort, City of Philadelphia , ran ashore near Cape Race, Newfoundland, on her maiden voyage from Liverpool, leaving Inman with just one ship. Then, on 27 September as the BAAS was in full session in the fresh neoclassical splendour of St George’s Hall, Liverpool, the Collins Line steamship Arctic foundered with the loss of perhaps as many as 350 passengers and crew after colliding with a small French steamer near the same cape. 2 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0100.028
Scholarly communication0.0100.011
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207