Bibliographic record
Abstract
The northern British Columbia coast includes the coastal mainland and the Queen Charlotte Islands. The archaeological record of this region is not as well known as other parts of the Northwest Coast. The period between ca. 10,000 and 5000 BP is known only for the Queen Charlotte Islands, and then only poorly, while the period after 5000 BP is represented best on the mainland, particularly through excavations in Prince Rupert Harbour. Evidence from adjacent portions of the coast clearly indicates that during the earlier period the northern British Columbia coast was occupied by hunter-gatherers using marine resources and habitats. In the subsequent period, people made use of an array of littoral and marine habitats, exploiting a wide range of re- sources, including the hunting of whales off the Queen Charlotte Islands. The regional economies appear to have undergone significant intensification around 3500 BP with the emergence of a storage-based economy and subsistence patterns marked by logisti- cal moves to offshore islands and other similar locations. Faunal remains from different sites suggest that marine mammals were generally important resources, though ex- ploitation patterns appear to have been localized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".