MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2502050063 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-5226

Abstract 5226: Genomic analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a patient with MUTYH-associated polyposis

2016· article· en· W2502050063 on OpenAlexaff
Kasmintan A. Schrader, Carolyn Chung, Eric Y. Stutheit-Zhao, Hui‐Li Wong, Yaoqing Shen, Martin Jones, Tom Thomson, Howard J. Lim, Sean Young, Carol Cremin, Robert A. Holt, Peter Eirew, Joanna M. Karasinska, Jacquie Schein, Yongjun Zhao, Richard A. Moore, Yussanne Ma, Alexandra Fok, Robyn Roscoe, Stephen Yip, Gillian Mitchell, Aly Karsan, Steven J.M. Jones, David J. Schaeffer, Janessa Laskin, Marco A. Marra, Daniel J. Renouf

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentrePancreas Centre (Canada)University of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMUTYHSanger sequencingGermlineKRASCancerBiologyBase excision repairColorectal cancerCancer researchGermline mutationMedicineGeneticsDNA repairGeneMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Biallelic pathogenic germline variants in the DNA repair glycosylase, MUTYH, cause MUTYH-associated polyposis, characterised by an increased susceptibility to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas secondary to defective base excision repair. We report a patient diagnosed with Stage IIB distal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at the age of 45 years. Prior colonoscopy and gastroscopy noted three colonic tubular adenomas and a gastric fundic gland polyp. The patient was consented to whole genome and transcriptome sequencing of the PDAC and matched normal blood DNA through the British Columbia Personalized Onco-Genomics (POG) program. Analysis of germline and somatic variants including single nucleotide variants, copy number determination, loss of heterozygosity detection and mutational signatures was undertaken. Expression fold-changes were calculated against Illumina BodyMap pancreatic tissue averages and compared against The Cancer Genome Atlas PDAC cases. Germline analysis revealed biallelic mutations in the MUTYH gene. In light of this patient's personal and family history of adenomatous colon polyps, clinic-initiated panel testing of 14 cancer susceptibility genes, including MUTYH, via Illumina sequencing with reflex Sanger confirmation revealed the same biallelic MUTYH changes. Analysis of the patient's PDAC revealed a base excision repair pathway signature, demonstrated by an increased frequency of C:G>A:T transversions, consistent with deficient MUTYH activity. This is the first association of germline MUTYH biallelic pathogenic variants with PDAC and provides evidence of the contribution of aberrant MUTYH function to the genomic landscape of a PDAC. Detection of the base excision repair mutational signature may be a sensitive way to screen tumors for aberrant MUTYH function that can reveal potential germline MUTYH-related cancer susceptibility, and allow inference of pathogenicity of detected MUTYH variants, which may have cancer prevention and therapeutic implications. Citation Format: Kasmintan A. Schrader, Carolyn Chu’ng, Eric Zhao, Hui-li Wong, Yaoqing Shen, Martin Jones, Tom Thomson, Howard Lim, Sean Young, Carol Cremin, Robert Holt, Peter Eirew, Joanna Karasinska, Jacquie Schein, Yongjun Zhao, Andy Mungall, Richard Moore, Yussanne Ma, Alexandra Fok, Robyn Roscoe, Stephen Yip, Gillian Mitchell, Aly Karsan, Steven Jones, David Schaeffer, Janessa Laskin, Marco Marra, Daniel Renouf. Genomic analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a patient with MUTYH-associated polyposis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 5226.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer→French-language works237,207→