MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2502117767 · doi:10.1057/9780230101593_15

Militarized Knowledge and Academic Soldiers: Arming the University

2009· book-chapter· en· W2502117767 on OpenAlexaff
Henry A. Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceState (computer science)BattleNeoliberalism (international relations)DemocracySubject (documents)Law and economicsOrder (exchange)Political economyAdversaryInvisible handGovernment (linguistics)LawSociologyEconomicsMarket economyPoliticsComputer securityHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If Michel Foucault is right that war is now “the motor behind institutions and order” and “a battlefront runs through the whole of society, continuously and permanently,” then we must try to understand what forces generate this permanent state of war and which side of the battle we want to be on, because, as Foucault insisted, “There is no such thing as a neutral subject.” If we are to heed Foucault’s warning that “We are all inevitably someone’s adversary,”l then we must make our decisions carefully based on an understanding of what kind of world we are currently living in and what kind of world we want to pass on to future generations of young people. Indeed, the war we are faced with today is global in scope as the forces of neoliberalism are on the march, dismantling the historically guaranteed social provisions provided by the welfare state, defining profitmaking as the essence of democracy, imposing rapacious free-trade agreements, saturating noneconomic spheres with market rationalities, and equating freedom with the unrestricted ability of markets to “govern economic relations free of government regulation.”2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicPolitics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle EastFrench-language works237,207