Case concerning Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 Air — Crimes against aircraft — Montreal Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, 1971 — Scope of Convention — Whether applicable to allegations of State terrorism — System of aut dedere aut punire — Dispute settlement mechanism — Applicability Extradition — General principles — Whether State under a duty to extradite in the absence of an extradition treaty — Anti-terrorist conventions — Montreal Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, 1971 — Extradition provisions — Whether State required to extradite own nationals — Whether Montreal Convention creating exclusive system — Demand for surrender of accused persons outside the context of the Convention International Court of Justice — Composition of bench — Judge ad hoc — Statute of the Court, Article 31(5) — Rules of Court, Articles 36 and 37 — Whether two States parties in the same interest — Circumstances in which judge disqualified from hearing case — Right of Party to case to nominate judge ad hoc to replace judge disqualified from sitting International Court of Justice — Jurisdiction — Date at which jurisdiction to be established — Montreal Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, 1971, Article 14(1) — Extent of jurisdiction conferred upon International Court of Justice — Conditions for seising International Court of Justice — Definition of a dispute — Existence of a dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention — The effect of United Nations Security Council Resolutions upon jurisdiction under Article 14(1) — Admissibility — Date at which question of admissibility to be determined International Court of Justice — Preliminary objections — Rules of Court, Article 79 — Objection possessing an exclusively preliminary character — Joinder of objection to the merits — Admissibility — Effect of Security Council Resolutions on dispute — Whether rendering Application without object International organizations — United Nations — Security 2 Council — Powers to maintain international peace and security — United Nations Charter, 1945, Chapter VII — Power to characterize situation as a threat to international peace and security — Acts of terrorism — Power to require State to take specified actions — Security Council requiring State to surrender terrorist suspects for trial — Security Council Resolutions 731 (1992), 748 (1992) and 883 (1993) — Effect — Binding character — United Nations Charter, Articles 25 and 103 — Whether affecting admissibility of Application — Whether rendering Application to Court without object — Relationship between Security Council and International Court of Justice — Whether Court possessing powers of judicial review
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".