MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2503062249 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316152461.001

Case concerning Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie

2000· article· en· W2503062249 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawJurisdictionPolitical scienceInternational courtConventionStatuteTreatyInternational lawPublic international law

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1 Air — Crimes against aircraft — Montreal Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, 1971 — Scope of Convention — Whether applicable to allegations of State terrorism — System of aut dedere aut punire — Dispute settlement mechanism — Applicability Extradition — General principles — Whether State under a duty to extradite in the absence of an extradition treaty — Anti-terrorist conventions — Montreal Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, 1971 — Extradition provisions — Whether State required to extradite own nationals — Whether Montreal Convention creating exclusive system — Demand for surrender of accused persons outside the context of the Convention International Court of Justice — Composition of bench — Judge ad hoc — Statute of the Court, Article 31(5) — Rules of Court, Articles 36 and 37 — Whether two States parties in the same interest — Circumstances in which judge disqualified from hearing case — Right of Party to case to nominate judge ad hoc to replace judge disqualified from sitting International Court of Justice — Jurisdiction — Date at which jurisdiction to be established — Montreal Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, 1971, Article 14(1) — Extent of jurisdiction conferred upon International Court of Justice — Conditions for seising International Court of Justice — Definition of a dispute — Existence of a dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention — The effect of United Nations Security Council Resolutions upon jurisdiction under Article 14(1) — Admissibility — Date at which question of admissibility to be determined International Court of Justice — Preliminary objections — Rules of Court, Article 79 — Objection possessing an exclusively preliminary character — Joinder of objection to the merits — Admissibility — Effect of Security Council Resolutions on dispute — Whether rendering Application without object International organizations — United Nations — Security 2 Council — Powers to maintain international peace and security — United Nations Charter, 1945, Chapter VII — Power to characterize situation as a threat to international peace and security — Acts of terrorism — Power to require State to take specified actions — Security Council requiring State to surrender terrorist suspects for trial — Security Council Resolutions 731 (1992), 748 (1992) and 883 (1993) — Effect — Binding character — United Nations Charter, Articles 25 and 103 — Whether affecting admissibility of Application — Whether rendering Application to Court without object — Relationship between Security Council and International Court of Justice — Whether Court possessing powers of judicial review

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0260.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0330.031
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207