Bibliographic record
Abstract
The publication of James Tyrrell's Patriarcha, Non Monarcha in 1681 was the first major Whig shot fired in the polemical dispute raised by the issue of Exclusion. It was at once a piece d'occasion devoted to advancing the Whig position in the Exclusion crisis and a major work of political philosophy dealing with such issues as the nature of political society, the origin of property, the principle of consent, and the main features of late-seventeenth-century natural jurisprudence. One commentator has observed that Patriarcha, Non Monarcha is “perhaps the most interesting work of political theory published in England between 1660 and 1689.” At its core, this work is the classic moderate Whig defense of limited government against what Tyrrell calls Filmer's “Absolute Monarchy Jure Divino .” In contrast, Tyrrell presents himself as a defender of the rule of law and rejects all of Filmer's attempts to deny the validity of the legal limits on monarchical power that require rulers to abstain from the “Lives, Liberties or Properties of their Subjects.” Tyrrell's moderate political credentials were impeccable. He was born in 1642 at the outbreak of England's turbulent civil war period. As the son of a prominent Buckinghamshire gentleman in royal service, Sir Timothy Tyrrell, and grandson on his maternal side of the celebrated champion of the divine right of kings, Archbishop Ussher of Armagh, James Tyrrell's familial political legacy was decidedly Cavalier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".