Abdelrazik <i>v.</i> Minister of Foreign Affairs and Attorney-General of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
377 Human rights — Right to enter country of nationality — Positive obligation on States to issue passports to nationals for repatriation — Intersection of United Nations Security Council resolutions with domestic human rights legislation — Standard of fairness to be observed by Minister of Foreign Affairs in refusing passports to Canadian nationals — Section 6(1) of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms International organizations — United Nations — United Nations Security Council — Committee established pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999) and 1989 (2011) — Al-Qaida Sanctions List — Asset freeze and travel ban — Proper interpretation of travel ban — Whether travel ban preventing repatriation Relationship of international law and municipal law — United Nations Security Council resolutions — 1267 Committee — Al-Qaida Sanctions List — Travel ban — Proper interpretation — Whether preventing repatriation — Constitutional provisions — Interpretation — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 6(1) — Canadian Passport Order, Section 10.1 — National security as justification for breach of human rights — Judicial review — Remedy Terrorism — United Nations — Security Council Committee — Resolution 1267 (1999) — Sanctions — Al-Qaida Sanctions List — Asset freeze and travel ban — Proper interpretation of travel ban — Whether travel ban preventing repatriation to Canada — Section 6(1) of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — The law of Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".