Glomus kerguelense sp. nov., a new Glomales species from sub-Antarctic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glomus kerguelense sp.nov.was isolated from a gravelly mineral soil at Kerguelen Islands, in association with the rhizosphere of introduced Agrostis stolonifera, Poaceae.This golden yellow spored species is distinguished from other Glomeraceae species by the granular ornamentation of the interior surface of the inner spore wall layer, and by a spongy zone gradually developed within the middle spore wall layer.The isolate differentiated vesicles and arbuscles inside Allium porrum roots and sporulated profusely in pot cultures.Glomus Kerguelense is, with G. antarcticum, the second Glomales species described originally from the Antarctic region.Glomus kerguelense sp.nov. a été isolé d'un sol minéral graveleux des Iles 'Kerguelen, dans la rhizosphére d'une Poacées introduite, Agrostis stolonifera.L'espéce aux spores jaune doré se distingue d' autres espéces de Gloméracées par une ornementation granulaire a la surface intérieure de la paroi interne et par une zone spongieuse graduellement différenciée dans la paroi médiane.L'isolat cultivé en pots différencie avec Allium porrum des vésicules et des arbuscules intraracinaires ainsi que des spores en abondance.Glomus kerguelense constitue, avec G. antarcticum, la seconde espéce de Glomeérales décrite des régions antarctiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".