MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2504797185 · doi:10.1201/b11113-15

Phylogeographic patterns in Artemia

2011· book-chapter· en· W2504797185 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ilias Kappas, Athanasios D. Baxevanis, Theodore J. Abatzopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueCrustacean issues · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhylogeographyBiologyEvolutionary biologyGeographyZoologyPhylogeneticsGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water fleas of the genus Daphnia (Crustacea: Cladocera) are key components of freshwater ecosystems, being primary consumers of algae and predated by fish and as such, have been extensively studied in the fields of limnology (Peters & de Bernardi 1987) and general ecology (Kalff 2002). In addition to their important ecological role, their wide geographic distribution, phenotypic variation, and peculiar reproductive mode (facultative parthenogenesis) have rendered them important models in evolutionary studies of speciation and adaptation (Schwenk et al. 2004). Extensive genetic surveys have revealed that the once thought cosmopolitan Daphnia species represent complexes of cryptic species with limited geographical distribution (Colbourne et al. 1998; Taylor et al. 1998). Fifteen different complexes were identified upon first sequencing 32 members of the genus Daphnia at the 16S mitochondrial gene (Colbourne & Hebert 1996). In this chapter, I will focus on one of these complexes: the Daphnia pulex complex that includes two major clades (the Daphnia pulicaria and the Daphnia tenebrosa clades) divided into ten divergent mitochondrial lineages (Colbourne et al. 1998). In North America, diploid D. pulex show a longitudinal gradient in their mode of reproduction with obligately asexual populations in eastern (temperate, subarctic, and arctic) Canada, mixed populations in Ontario, and cyclically parthenogenetic populations in western Canada (Hebert & Crease 1983; Hebert et al. 1993). Transitions to obligate parthenogenesis are thought to incur due to meiosis-suppressor genes that disrupt meiosis in females but not in males (Innes & Hebert 1988). As a result, males carrying these genes spread the “asexuality genes” in a contagious fashion. Meiosis-suppressor genes are thought to have arisen in an eastern D. pulex lineage and, hence, may explain the geographical distribution of obligate parthenogenesis in this species (Paland et al. 2005). In addition, glacial advances and retreat have provoked, through isolation in refugia and secondary contacts, hybridization and polyploidizations of numerous lineages of the complex in subarctic and arctic areas (Dufresne & Hebert 1997). Sharp phylogeographical patterns have been found in these young arctic lineages (Weider et al. 1999a; Markova´ et al. 2007) suggesting that historical processes have contributed significantly to the current distribution of these lineages. The recent sequencing of the Daphnia pulex genome will provide additional tools that will greatly contribute to our understanding of speciation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrustacean issuesSame topicEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFrench-language works237,207