MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2505503163 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316018439.002

Indigenous Memories and Western American Literary History

2015· book-chapter· en· W2505503163 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan Bernardin

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousState (computer science)PaintingGeopoliticsNarrativeHistoryMateriality (auditing)GeographyFLAGS registerGenealogyEthnologyPolitical scienceArt historyArtLiteraturePoliticsLawAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indian Country In a series of paintings instigated by the Columbus Quincentenary, Jaune Quick-to-See Smith (Confederated Salish and Kootenai) repeatedly reframes the map of the lower forty-eight United States through shifting, startling perspectives. One pair of paintings, entitled Tribal Map and Tribal Map II , replaces state names with the names of Indigenous nations in current “recognized” locations. The swath of states empty of Indigenous names, as well as the numerous names spilling across the borders of Oklahoma, invoke histories of forced removals and new homelands. At the same time, drips of paint that bleed the boundaries between states gesture toward the violent materiality of how those states were formed. Enlarging the frame to encompass hemispheric Indigenous presence, Smith includes text equations that compress histories of both continuance and containment: “Canada 2,250 reserves”; “American Indians Mexico 23.5 million”; “American Indians South America 20.4 million.” The names and numbers assert the hemispheric persistence of Indigenous peoples within geopolitical boundaries not of their own making. The dense narrative landscape of two other map paintings, Indian Map and Indian Country Today , papers the United States with newspaper clippings and photographs, illustrating the diversity and complexity of Indigenous experiences in the Americas. Just as many state names are also Indigenous words, constant reminders of a history hidden in plain sight, Smith's maps also notably reference landmarks of Indian Country: In Memory Map , boldly colored petroglyphs move across and beyond the frames of the United States. In doing so, they visualize the foundational premise of Native studies: that everywhere is Indian Country. With these multiple invocations to remember, Smith also recognizes the continuing communicative power of Indigenous languages and expressive forms that mark specific, ongoing relationships to land, relationships that map political, spiritual, storied geographies. One of these paintings resides in the nation's capital at the Smithsonian American Art Museum. In the artist's statement that accompanies State Painting , Smith directs viewers on how to read her visual text of resistance and remembering: “I can't say strongly enough that my maps are about stolen lands, our very heritage, our cultures, our worldview, our being…. Every map is a political map and tells a story – that we are alive everywhere across this nation”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicArchaeology and Natural History→French-language works237,207→