MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2505666614 · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30313-8

Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma (EORTC 22033-26033): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 intergroup study

2016· article· en· W2505666614 on OpenAlexafffund
Brigitta G. Baumert, Monika E. Hegi, Martin J. van den Bent, Andreas von Deimling, Thierry Gorlia, Khê Hoang‐Xuan, Alba A. Brandes, Guy Kantor, Mohamed Ben Hassel, Christian Hartmann, Gail Ryan, David Capper, Johan M. Kros, Sebastian Kurscheid, Wolfgang Wick, Roelien H. Enting, Michele Reni, Brian Thiessen, F. Dhermain, Jacoline E. C. Bromberg, L. Feuvret, Jaap C. Reijneveld, Olivier Chinot, Johanna M. M. Gijtenbeek, John P. Rossiter, Nicolas Dif, Carmen Balañá, Jose Bravo-Marques, Paul M. Clément, Christine Marosi, Tzahala Tzuk-Shina, Robert Nordal, Jeremy Rees, Denis Lacombe, Warren Mason, Roger Stupp

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of CalgaryQueen's UniversityUniversity of TorontoBC Cancer Agency
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteMedical Research CouncilNational Cancer InstituteKrebsliga SchweizCancer Research UK
KeywordsTemozolomideMedicineGliomaInternal medicineRadiation therapyChemotherapyOncologyOligodendrogliomaSurgeryGastroenterologyAstrocytoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations498
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207