MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2506541852 · doi:10.1190/1.9781560802197.ch12

Seafloor Compliance Imaging of Marine Gas-Hydrate Deposits

2010· book-chapter· en· W2506541852 on OpenAlex
Eleanor C. Willoughby, Konstantin Latychev, R. N. Edwards, Katrin Schwalenberg, R. D. Hyndman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSociety of Exploration Geophysicists eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClathrate hydrateSeafloor spreadingPhysicsGeologyHydrateChemistryGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marine gas-hydrate deposits can cause certain bulk physical properties of marine sediments to be anomalous; geophysical imaging methods sensitive to these properties are thus useful diagnostic tools. Elastic parameters, in particular, are affected by the displacement of pore fluids by an icelike solid. Seismic methods are sensitive to elastic parameters; however, estimation of gas-hydrate content in marine sediments using seismic methods alone is difficult. Seafloor compliance, the transfer function between pressure induced by surface gravity waves and the associated deformation, is most sensitive to the mean shear modulus of volumes of underlying subseafloor material; hence it can be used to infer gas-hydrate content. The variation of compliance with frequency or source wavelength provides information on elastic structure as a function of depth. Thus depth profiles of elastic moduli and density, or conversely, the more familiar seismic velocities can be calculated from these data. The method is sensitive to smeared out volumes of underlying material, so it is more useful for estimating bulk properties of the subsection. It has the advantage of a naturally occurring source, relative logistical simplicity, low cost, and unlike seismic data, is largely insensitive to, and hence unhampered by, the presence of free gas. Further, results from full 3D finite difference modeling indicate that these data are sensitive to mean properties of gas-hydrate-bearing marine sediment, regardless of the heterogeneous nature of gas-hydrate distribution. The method has been used to address outstanding questions about the nature of seismic blank zones, such as the cold vent field offshore Vancouver Island, near Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Site 889 and the recent Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Expedition 311. Data have been gathered at many sites with a high-sensitivity recording gravimeter and a differential pressure gauge lowered to the seafloor, which record compliance time series. Here, we present a review of the underlying theory along with data sets, which show that compliance is apt for hydrate assessment, complementary to seismic and electrical methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it