Characteristics of Fluid Inclusion and D-O-S-Pb Isotopes Geochemistry of Jiaojia Gold Deposit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Jiaojia gold deposit is located in the northwest jiaodong ore-concentrated area, north wing of Laizhou-Xixia anticlinoria, the orebody occurred in the granite which exists the footwall of Jiaojia Fault, Jiaojia Fault is the eastern secondary NE-NNE trending fault of Tan-Lu Great Fault. There are three types of fluid inclusion in Jiaojia gold deposit, respectively are H2O-CO2 inclusion (H-C type), CO2-H2O-CH4 inclusion (CH4 -bearing type) and H2O inclusion (H type). In Jiaojia gold deposit, the main ore-forming temperature is 170.2～358.1℃, the salinity is ranging from 2.04 wt% NaCl.eq to 10 wt% NaCl.eq with a average of 6.64 wt% NaCl.eq, sum intensity is (0.89～0.946) g/cm3 , pressure estimation is 2×103～3.8×103kPa, the Jiaojia gold deposit is mesothermal gold deposit. The metallogenic substances derived from a mantle-crust-mixed source according to the S and Pb isotopes. The Jiaojia gold deposit was formed in the late stage which was a tensional environment. The ore-forming fluids mainly derived from magmatic and meteoric water, and a fraction of metamorphic water. The Jiaojia gold deposit is formed in the Yanshanian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".