MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

UTILITY OF PRE-HOSPITAL LACTATE MEASUREMENT FOR TRAUMA PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2016· review· en· W2507181661 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher Lewis, Mark J. Midwinter, Nicholas Crombie

Bibliographic record

VenueEmergency Medicine Journal · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency medicineTrauma centerResuscitationIntensive care medicineInjury Severity ScoreRetrospective cohort studyPoison controlInternal medicineInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Serum lactate serves as a surrogate marker for tissue hypoxia following traumatic injury, and may be used to guide resuscitation. The portable, lightweight nature of handheld point-of-care monitoring devices enables lactate values to be readily available in the pre-hospital environment, whether in land or air based evacuation modalities. The current review evaluates the utility of pre-hospital lactate measurement in the management of trauma patients. Methods The published literature up to 06 August 2015 was searched using Medline and EMBASE using pre-defined criteria (English language, pre-hospital lactate measurement, trauma patients; excluding non-trauma/mixed patient groups). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias of individual studies. Results Of 857 non-duplicate articles of interest, 5 articles met the inclusion criteria, and included four cohort studies and one cross-sectional study. There were 2049 patients included in all studies. Key findings ▸ Pre-hospital lactate may be an independent prognostic marker of in-hospital mortality, multiple organ dysfunction, and requirement for transfusion or surgical intervention in trauma patients, particularly in blunt trauma. ▸ Pre-hospital lactate measurement may be more sensitive than systolic blood pressure in determining need for resuscitative care. ▸ Early lactate measurement may be particularly useful in the detection of occult hypotension, with elevated levels detectable within 30 minutes of injury. ▸ All current studies that investigate pre-hospital lactate were assessed as being at risk of bias. Conclusions There is a paucity of evidence relating to pre-hospital lactate-guided management in trauma. From the limited literature, it seems that pre-hospital lactate may be a useful early tool in guiding the management of trauma patient resuscitation. Further prospective studies are required to elucidate the sensitivity and specificity of abnormal pre-hospital lactate values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.055
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.055
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.008
Bibliometrics0.0120.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmergency Medicine JournalSame topicTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207