Arabidopsis DDB1-CUL4 E3 ligase complexes in <i>det1</i> salt/osmotic stress resistant germination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A key regulatory mechanism in plant growth, development, and stress signaling utilizes E3 ubiquitin ligases, which target a variety of substrates for degradation. DE-ETIOLATED 1 (DET1) forms a complex with DDB1 (DAMAGED DNA BINDING protein 1) and CUL4 (CULLIN 4), and negatively regulates light signaling. Another DDB1-CUL4 complex containing DWA1 and DWA2 (DWD hypersensitive to ABA 1 and 2) has been shown to negatively regulate abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. Since distinct DDB1-CUL4 complexes have been shown to influence each other, we analyzed genetic interactions between DET1 and components of DDB1-CUL4 complexes during seed germination under salt and osmotic stress conditions. det1 germination was resistant to salt and osmotic stress and dwa1 and dwa2 enhanced this phenotype. In contrast, ddb1a partially suppressed the det1 germination phenotype on both salt and mannitol, while ddb1b had no effect. Mutations in DDB2, a DDB1-CUL4 complex component involved in DNA repair, also partially suppressed the det1 germination phenotype while mutants in COP1, another light signaling component, completely suppressed the det1 resistant germination phenotypes. Taken together these data suggest that components of E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes have variable but significant effects on det1 salt/osmotic stress responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".