MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507558744 · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1691

Screening for Neonatal Hypoglycemia After Fetal Exposure to β-Blockers

2016· letter· en· W2507558744 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anne Synnes

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsB.C. Women's Hospital & Health CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypoglycemiaNeonatal hypoglycemiaFetusPediatricsPregnancyObstetricsEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this issue of Pediatrics, Bateman et al1 have elegantly convinced readers that infants of mothers prescribed β-blockers in late pregnancy, in a large American database, have a significantly elevated risk (4.3%) of neonatal hypoglycemia, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.68. This finding is important because β-blockers are used commonly to treat hypertensive orders in pregnancy, and in Bateman et al’s study >10 000 women, 0.5% of pregnancies, delivering between 2003 and 2007 were exposed to β-blockers at the time of delivery. Their results are physiologically plausible because β-blockers cross the placenta, and the resultant sympathetic blockade could be expected to lead to hypoglycemia, which may be asymptomatic. Screening for hypoglycemia appears to be the natural … Address correspondence to Anne Synnes, MDCM, MHSc, 4500 Oak St, Room 1R13, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1 Canada. E-mail: asynnes{at}cw.bc.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICSSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207