MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507685152 · doi:10.1180/minmag.2016.080.026

From structure topology to chemical composition. XX. Titanium silicates: the crystal structure of hejtmanite, Ba<sub>2</sub>Mn<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>2</sub>(Si<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>F<sub>2</sub>, a Group-II TS-block mineral

2016· article· en· W2507685152 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsTriclinic crystal systemCrystallographyElectron microprobeCrystal structureChemical compositionCrystal chemistryCrystal (programming language)Materials scienceTitaniumChemistryMineralogyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The crystal structure of hejtmanite, Ba 2 Mn 4 Ti 2 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 2 F 2 , from Mbolve Hill, Mkushi River area, Central Province, Zambia (holotype material) has been refined on a twinned crystal to R 1 = 1.88% on the basis of 4539 [|F| &gt; 4|F|] reflections. Hejtmanite is triclinic, C 1̅, a = 10.716(2), b = 13.795(3), c = 11.778 (2) , = 90.07(3), = 112.24(3), = 90.03(3), V = 1612(2) 3 . Chemical analysis (electron microprobe) gives: Ta 2 O 5 0.09, Nb 2 O 5 1.27, ZrO 2 0.65, TiO 2 14.35, SiO 2 23.13, BaO 26.68, SrO 0.19, FeO 11.28, MnO 15.12, Cs 2 O 0.05, K 2 O 0.33, F 3.82, H 2 O calc . 1.63, O = F 1.61, total 97.10 wt.%, where the H 2 O content was calculated from the crystal-structure refinement, with (OH F) = 4 apfu. The empirical formula, calculated on the basis of 20 (O F) anions, is of the form (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 (X O ) 4 (X P ) 2 , Z=4: (Ba 1.82 K 0.07 Sr 0.02 ) Σ1.91 (Mn 2.33 Zr 0.04 Mg 0.03 ) Σ3.95 (Ti 1.88 Nb 0.10 Zr 0.02 ) Σ2 (Si 2.02 O 7 ) 2 O 2 [(OH) 1.89 F 0.11 ] Σ2 F 2 . The crystal structure is a combination of a TS (Titanium Silicate) block and an I (intermediate) block. The TS block consists of HOH sheets (H heteropolyhedral, O octahedral). The topology of the TS block is as in Group-II TS-block minerals: Ti ( Nb) = 2 apfu per (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 [as defined by Sokolova (2006)]. In the O sheet, five [6] M O sites are occupied mainly by Mn, less Fe 2 and minor Zr and Mg, with &lt;MOφ&gt; = 2.198 (φ = O,OH), ideally giving Mn 4 apfu. In the H sheet, two [6] M H sites are occupied mainly by Ti, with &lt;M H φ&gt; = 1.962 (φ = O,F), ideally giving Ti 2 apfu; four [4] Si sites are occupied by Si, with &lt; SiO&gt; = 1.625 . The M H octahedra and Si 2 O 7 groups constitute the H sheet. The two [12] Ba-dominant A P (1,2) sites, with &lt;A P φ&gt; = 2.984 (φ = O, F), ideally give Ba 2 apfu. Two (1,2) and two (1,2) sites are occupied by O atoms and OH groups with minor F, respectively, ideally giving (X O ) 4 = ( ) 2 ( )2=O 2 (OH) 2 pfu. Two (1,2) sites are occupied by F, giving F 2 apfu. TS blocks link via a layer of Ba atoms which constitute the I block. Simplified and end-member formulae of hejtmanite are Ba 2 (Mn,Fe 2 ) 4 Ti 2 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 2 (OH,F) 2 F 2 and Ba 2 Mn 4 Ti 2 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 2 F 2 , Z = 4. Hejtmanite is a Mn-analogue of bafertisite, Ba 2 4 Ti 2 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 2 F 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0120.010
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.006
Bibliometrics0.0050.011
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0110.007
Research integrity0.0090.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it