MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2507703924 · doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3243-2

Scaling-up an efficacious school-based physical activity intervention: Study protocol for the ‘Internet-based Professional Learning to help teachers support Activity in Youth’ (iPLAY) cluster randomized controlled trial and scale-up implementation evaluation

2016· article· en· W2507703924 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Lonsdale, Taren Sanders, Kristen E. Cohen, Philip D. Parker, Michael Noetel, Timothy B. Hartwig, Diego Vasconcellos, Morwenna Kirwan, Philip J. Morgan, Jo Salmon, Marj Moodie, Heather McKay, Andrew Bennie, Ronald C. Plotnikoff, Renata Cinelli, David Greene, Louisa Peralta, Dylan P. Cliff, Gregory S. Kolt, Jennifer Gore, Lan Gao, David R. Lubans

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNSW Department of Education
KeywordsBiostatisticsMedicineRandomized controlled trialIntervention (counseling)Protocol (science)The InternetPublic healthCluster (spacecraft)Scale (ratio)Cluster randomised controlled trialMedical educationPhysical therapyAlternative medicineNursingWorld Wide WebInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations293
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicChildren's Physical and Motor Development→French-language works237,207→