MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508183511 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05838

Gold–Manganese Oxide Core–Shell Nanoparticles Produced by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Water

2016· article· en· W2508183511 on OpenAlex
Teresa São Simão, Daniel M. Chevrier, Jurij Jakobi, Andreas Korinek, G. Goupil, Marcus Lau, Sébastien Garbarino, Peng Zhang, Stephan Barcikowski, Marc‐André Fortin, Daniel Guay

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecBrockhouse Institute for Materials ResearchDalhousie UniversityMcMaster University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsManganeseMaterials scienceLaser ablationNanoparticleLaser ablation synthesis in solutionXANESMetalFluenceExtended X-ray absorption fine structureLaserOxideLayer (electronics)Colloidal goldAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyAbsorption spectroscopyChemistrySpectral lineMetallurgyOpticsX-ray laserLaser power scaling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A single-step procedure for the preparation of Au–MnO x NPs was achieved through pulsed laser ablation of a gold–manganese metal target made of a pressed metal powder mixture. First, a 248 nm nanosecond laser at 66.7 J cm –2 was used to synthesize Au–MnO x NPs from a gold–manganese metal target immersed in an aqueous solution at pH 11 (NaOH). It is demonstrated that the Au–MnO x NPs are made of a small Au core (around 5 nm in diameter) surrounded by a very thin manganese oxide layer (0.3–1.3 nm) as characterized by TEM, HAADF HR-STEM, and EELS. The superficial MnO x layer has a local structure that bears a close resemblance to that of Mn 2 O 3 and MnO 2 as revealed by EXAFS and XANES measurements. Comparative studies were also performed with a 1064 nm nanosecond laser at 1.4 J cm –2 . In that case, the resulting colloids are mainly made of a mixture of Au NPs and MnO x NPs, with few Au–MnO x NPs, thereby suggesting the impact of the laser wavelength and fluence on the synthesis process. The mechanisms responsible for the production of Au–MnO x core–shell NPs are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it