MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508233799 · doi:10.3406/numi.2015.3280

La réouverture de la Monnaie de Grenoble et la dernière émission des espèces « aux armes du Dauphiné » (1702-1703)

2015· article· en· W2508233799 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christian Charlet

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue numismatique · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMetallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtQuarter (Canadian coin)HumanitiesHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mint of Grenoble, which had been closed in 1662, reopened only in March 1702, on the occasion of the third reformation (September 1701-October 1703). Its production was mediocre and the mint ceased operating even before the end of the reformation. Over this period it struck a small quantity of gold and silver coins, including the extremely rare silver series with “ royal insignia” and “ the arms of Dauphiné” on its four denominations : ecu, half-ecu, quarter-ecu, twelfth-ecu. This issue was the last one to show the quartered arms of the province with that of the king. Later on, when it reopened in 1704 and 1709, Grenoble struck only with the arms of France. The author has already devoted to this mint three articles in the Revue Numismatique (1990, 1992 and 1995), and four communications in the BSFN (1990, 1991, 1992 and 2012). He thus pursues his study of the mint of Grenoble from 1610 to 1715, and analyses for the first time the period 1702-1703 while publishing all the 15 known specimens with the arms of Dauphiné.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue numismatiqueSame topicMetallurgy and Cultural ArtifactsFrench-language works237,207