Variedades de cerezo de maduración tardía
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEn los ultimos anos se esta produciendo una importante renovacion varietal en el cultivo del cerezo, con la introduccion de nuevas variedades obtenidas en programas de mejora de distintos paises. Entre los objetivos de estos programas, destaca la ampliacion del periodo de recoleccion. En este trabajo se describe un grupo de variedades de cerezo de maduracion tardia, que pueden ser interesantes en las zonas de produccion mas tardias. Se han seleccionado variedades cuya epoca de maduracion se produce al menos 30 dias despues que ‘Burlat’, que se considera variedad de referencia. Se incluyen variedades ya establecidas, como ‘Skeena’, ‘Sweetheart’, ‘Staccato’ y las picotas espanolas ‘Ambrunes’, ‘Pico Colorado’ y ‘Pico Negro’, junto a nuevas obtenciones procedentes de Alemania (‘Regina’), Canada (‘Sovereign’, ‘Sentennial’, ‘Simphony’), Estados Unidos (‘Royal Helen’), Francia (‘Fertard’) y Hungria (‘Alex’). EnglishLate–ripening sweet cherry cultivars. In the last years an important renewal of plant material is taking place with the introduction of a number of new varieties from breeding programs of different countries. One of the main objectives of these programs is the extension of the cherry recollection period. In this work, a group of sweet cherry varieties is described, whose ripening time occurs at least 30 days after the ripening time of ‘Burlat’. Traditional cultivars have been included, as ‘Skeena’, ‘Sweetheart’, ‘Staccato’ and the Spanish picotas ‘Ambrunes’, ‘Pico Colorado’ and ‘Pico Negro’, as well as new cultivars introduced in the last years from Germany (‘Regina’), Canada (‘Sovereign’, ‘Sentennial’, ‘Simphony’), the United States (‘Royal Helen’), France (‘Fertard’) and Hungary (‘Alex’).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".