MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508503202 · doi:10.1139/gen-2016-0159

From Barcodes to Biomes: Special Issues from the 6th International Barcode of Life Conference

2016· article· en· W2508503202 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sarah J. Adamowicz, Frédéric J. J. Chain, Elizabeth L. Clare, Kristy Deiner, Vlad Dincă, Manuel Elías‐Gutiérrez, Axel Hausmann, Ian D. Hogg, Mari Kekkonen, Darío A. Lijtmaer, Amanda M. Naaum, Dirk Steinke, Martha Valdéz-Moreno, Michelle van der Bank, John‐James Wilson, Jianping Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBarcodeBiologyBiomeDNA barcodingEvolutionary biologyEcologyComputer scienceEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

efforts and complementary marker testing are ongoing for some taxonomic groups

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.014
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0140.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207