MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Sedentary Time among Adults with Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Conditions

2016· article· en· W2508990659 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shilpa Dogra

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCOPDAsthmaPhysical therapyMoodDepression (economics)Sedentary lifestylePsychological interventionAffect (linguistics)Internal medicinePhysical activityPsychiatryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are prevalent conditions that affect 1 in 12 and 1 in 6 Canadians, respectively. Asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) has been shown to affect between 15-20% of those with COPD. However, little is known of sedentary time in any of these groups. Given the health consequences of sedentary time, reduction interventions may be an important avenue for improving health among those with chronic obstructive respiratory disease. PURPOSE: To describe self-reported weekly sedentary time, and to determine the association between sedentary time and health outcomes among adults with asthma, COPD or ACOS. METHODS: A sample of adults from the Canadian Community Health Survey (2011-2012) was used for analysis. Average weekly sedentary time in the past 3 months was categorized in 5 hour increments and dichotomized as >29 hours or <29 hours; this cut-point represents 4 hours of sedentary time per day. Self-reported physician diagnosed asthma and COPD were used to categorize respiratory conditions. Respondents with both COPD and asthma were classified as ACOS. Each category was exclusive of the other. Perceived health, mood disorder (depression) and high blood pressure were used as outcomes. RESULTS: Of those with ACOS (n=1,673), 29.4% were sedentary for 45 or more hours per week. Similarly, 27.6% of those with COPD (n=3,290) and 16.7% of those with asthma (n=6,151) were sedentary for 45 or more hours per week. In models adjusted for age, sex, physical activity levels and presence of cardiometabolic disease (diabetes, heart disease or stroke), adults with asthma, COPD and ACOS had a 21% (OR: 1.21, CI: 1.10-1.28), 70% (OR: 1.70, CI: 1.52-1.90) and 75% (OR: 1.75, CI: 1.50-2.04) higher odds of being sedentary for 29 or more hours per week compared to those with no respiratory conditions. Similarly, in fully adjusted models, individuals with asthma and COPD who were sedentary had higher odds of good perceived health, mood disorders and high blood pressure compared to those who were non-sedentary. Among those with ACOS, blood pressure was not associated with sedentary time (OR: 0.91, CI: 0.65-1.26). CONCLUSION: It appears that adults with chronic obstructive respiratory conditions are engaging in high volumes of sedentary time and that sedentary time is associated with worse health outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicPhysical Activity and Health→French-language works237,207→