MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Supramaximal Exercise Training Enhances several Health-Related Outcomes in Obese Adults

2016· article· en· W2509077575 on OpenAlexaff
Georges Jabbour, Horia-Daniel Iancu

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnthropometryVO2 maxBody mass indexBlood pressureInternal medicinePhysical therapyHeart rateObesityEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studying the effects of exercise training on health- and performance-related outcomes may be the best approach to describing its beneficial effects among obese individuals. PURPOSE: The present study evaluates the effects of six weeks of supramaximal exercise training (SET) on performance variables and metabolic changes in sedentary obese adults. METHODS: Twenty-four obese adults were randomized into a non-trained (NT) [n=12; body mass index (BMI)=33(3)] and SET group [n=12; BMI=(33(2)]. After baseline metabolic, anthropometric, and fitness measurements, the participants completed a 6-week SET intervention comprising 18 sessions of 6 repeats of 6-second supramaximal sprints on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer, with 2-minute recovery between each repetition. Metabolic, anthropometric, and fitness assessments were repeated post-intervention. RESULTS: Neither anthropometrics nor maximal oxygen uptake differed between the groups after 6 weeks of SET. For SET, fasting glucose (4.64(0.15) vs 4.32(0.22) mmol/l; p<0.01), insulin (23.2(4.6) vs 13.8(3.3) μmol/ml; p<0.01), HOMA-IR (4.78(1.2) vs 2.65(1.5); p<0.01), and systolic blood pressure (127(3) vs 120(3) mmHg; p<0.01) were significantly lower 24-hours post-intervention than at baseline and for the NT group, and these changes remained significant at 72-hours and two-weeks post-intervention (p<0.01, respectively). Interestingly, NFEA (0.62(0.09) vs 0.71(0.11) mmol/l; p<0.01) and resting fat oxidation rate (57(11) vs 63(4) %; p<0.01) increased significantly from baseline 24-hours post-intervention in the SET group and decreased significantly from baseline at 72-hours (p<0.01, respectively) and two-weeks post-intervention (p<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no changes in the participants’ anthropometric and aerobic fitness variables, six weeks of SET improved a number of metabolic and vascular risk factors in obese, sedentary adults, highlighting the potential of SET to provide an alternative exercise model for the improvement of metabolic health in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCardiovascular and exercise physiology→French-language works237,207→