MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509318957 · doi:10.12927/hcpol.2016.24941

What’s Measured Is Not Necessarily What Matters: A Cautionary Story from Public Health

2016· review· en· W2509318957 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Raisa Deber, Robert S. Schwartz

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare policy · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsOntario Tobacco Research UnitPublic Health Ontario
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBenchmarkingUnintended consequencesPerformance measurementFlexibility (engineering)MandatePopulation healthQuality (philosophy)Performance managementBusinessRisk analysis (engineering)Health carePublic relationsPopulationMarketingMedicinePolitical scienceEnvironmental healthEconomicsManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.270
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.470
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.900

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2700.470
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.004
Bibliometrics0.0060.010
Science and technology studies0.0030.021
Scholarly communication0.0110.035
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0140.035
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.316
GPT teacher head0.518
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainEvaluation
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare policySame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207