MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Platelet-Activating Anti-Platelet Factor 4/Polyanion Antibodies without Preceding Heparin Therapy: A Transient Autoimmune Disorder Resembling Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (“Spontaneous HIT”).

2006· article· en· W2509499585 on OpenAlexaff
Theodore E. Warkentin, Richard M. Jay, Michael Makris, John G. Kelton

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeparin-induced thrombocytopeniaHeparinPlatelet factor 4MedicinePlateletImmunologyThrombosisAntibodyPlatelet activationImmune systemInternal medicineGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic disorder with autoimmune features: its target antigen is a “self” protein, platelet factor 4 (PF4), that is conformationally modified in the presence of heparin or certain other polyanions. A central dogma in HIT is that the antibodies are invariably triggered by treatment with heparin. We report four patients who developed an acute illness strongly resembling immune HIT despite the absence of any preceding heparin administration [Table 1]. Various inflammatory or invasive events were documented during the two-week period prior to each patient’s acute illness, suggesting that factors other than heparin can trigger an immune response against PF4/polyanion complexes. Following onset of their HIT-like illness, three of the patients received unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to treat proven or suspected thrombosis, which precipitated abrupt platelet count falls in all. Serum from all four patients contained antibodies serologically indistinguishable from those causing HIT, namely platelet-activating immunoglobulin G (IgG) recognizing PF4 bound to heparin or polyvinyl sulfonate [Table 2]. Two patients died from thrombosis; in the two survivors, antibodies became undetectable during follow-up, consistent with the transient nature of the anti-PF4/heparin immune response reported in HIT. Conclusion: These four patient cases suggest that on rare occasions a transient prothrombotic autoimmune disorder strongly resembling immune HIT can occur, “spontaneous HIT”. Table 1. Clinical features: 4 patients with “spontaneous HIT” Case Age M/F Platelet count nadir (× 10^9^/L) Sequelae Event(s) in preceding two weeks * UFH or LMWH were only given for proven or suspected thrombosis after “spontaneous HIT” disorder was established; DIC = disseminated intravascular coagulation 1 69 M 17 (no heparin given) Limb artery thromboses (amputations); pulmonary embolism; DIC; fatal myocardial infarction Ampicillin (sore tooth); corticosteroid injection into wrist 2 40 F 175 (pre-UFH*); 59 (post-UFH*) Stroke; limb artery thrombosis (amputation) Incision & draining procedures (recurrent groin cyst) 3 69 F 33 (pre-UFH*); 11 (post-UFH*) Bilateral adrenal infarction; digital infarcts; deep-vein thrombosis; DIC Knee replacement surgery 4 24 F 301 (pre-LMWH*); 62 (post-LMWH*) Acute systemic reaction after LMWH Pneumonia Table 2. Serologic features: 4 patients with “spontaneous HIT” Case Maximum serotonin release (0.1-0.3 U/mL UFH) (N<10%) Serotonin release (Fc receptor-blocking monoclonal antibody) Serotonin release (100 U/mL UFH) Anti-PF4/H ELISA (IgG) (N<0.450 OD U)* Anti-PF4/polyanion ELISA, GTI (N<0.400 OD U)* * >80% inhibition in presence of 100 U/mL UFH was seen with all 4 blood samples and in both ELISAs (not shown) 1 99% 1% 0% 2.028 2.722 2 95% 0% 0% 2.909 2.284 3 100% 0% 0% 1.888 2.950 4 80% 0% 0% 1.866 2.622

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHeparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and ThrombosisFrench-language works237,207