MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510027200 · doi:10.1515/ans-2003-0204

Asymptotic Estimates of the First Eigenvalue of the p-Laplacian

2003· article· en· W2510027200 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Colbois, Ana-María Matei

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Nonlinear Studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsEigenfunctionQuotientEigenvalues and eigenvectorsLaplace operatorInvariant (physics)Degenerate energy levelsSectional curvatureMathematical analysisPure mathematicsNorm (philosophy)LambdaConstant (computer programming)CurvatureGeometryMathematical physicsScalar curvature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We consider a 1-parameter family of hyperbolic surfaces M(t) of genus ν which degenerate as t → 0 and we obtain a precise estimate of λ 1,p (t), the first eigenvalue of the p-Laplacian (p > 1) on M(t). In some cases we also give a precise estimate of the first eigenfunctions. As a direct application, we obtain that the quotient (which is invariant under scaling of the metric) is unbounded even on the set of Riemannian manifolds with constant sectional curvature. This is to our knowledge, the first example of a family of manifolds with this property. To prove our results we use in an essential way the geometry of hyperbolic surfaces which is very well known. We show that an eigenfunction for λ 1,p (t) of L p norm one is almost constant in the L p sense (as t → 0) on the parts of M(t) with large injectivity radius, and we estimate precisely its p-energy on the parts with small injectivity radius.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Nonlinear StudiesSame topicGeometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsFrench-language works237,207