MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510070596

Listen, Here Is a Story: Ethnographic Life Narratives from Aka and Ngandu Women of the Congo Basin

2013· article· en· W2510070596 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C. S’thembile West

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Comparative Family Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeAKASociologyGender studiesHonorHistoryMedia studiesLiteratureLibrary scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bonnie L. Hewlett Listen, Here Is a Story: Ethnographic Life Narratives from Aka and Ngandu Women of the Congo Basin. Ithaca, NY: Oxford University Press (2012). 272 pages, ISBN 978-0199764235.An anthropologist engaged in participant observation, Bonnie L. Hewlett's text raises questions about the interdependence and shifting emphases among the Aka and Ngandu peoples in the Congo Basin of the Central African Republic. Her study show how global economics and materialism impact traditional ways of life. In Listen, Here Is a Story: Ethnographic Life Narratives from Aka and Ngandu Women of the Congo Basin, Aka-referred to as Pygmies in many venues, although the term, in my opinion, strikes a pejorative, diminutive note that devalues the culture-and Ngandu women identify themselves and life within their community. explain distinctive interactions. Their stories are practical and profound. The commentaries re-enforce that knowledge of the past-particularly the values of shared production and respect-helps to facilitate a necessary mix of old and new approaches to stave-off critical environmental and social challenges: deforestation, mining gold, the replacement of net-hunting with automatic weaponry-i.e., guns-and relocation from forest to villages.First, two Aka and two Ngandu women, Nali-age not listed, but has a son named to honor Hewlett-and Konga (age 70 or older) as well as Blondine (age 43) and Therese (age 70-75) yrs.) respectively, provide a glimpse of life in the village of Nambele. That the women approached Hewlett and enter into an exchange that teaches the researcher on levels that cannot be ascertained by observations of the two ethnic groups, represents a striking starting point of the text: This story begins one hot afternoon with a knock on my door. Standing in my yard was a group of about eight Ngandu women and Adoxi, my research assistant. They want to talk to you, she said to me, They want you to stop talking to the children and start talking to them(l). Hence, Listen, Here Is a Story, an ethnographic study of Aka and Ngandu women, began.The honesty and forthrightness of the four speakers is notable. Although the brief insertions by the researcher offer anthropological context with respect to terms and seminal work in the field, the technical language jars the reader, after having experienced the direct, frank, conversational style of the informants. Nevertheless, Hewlett presents a necessary overview of the differences between foragers, the Aka and sedentary farmers, the Ngandu as well as how their foci support diverse family structures. Gender divisions among the Ngandu, whose female constituency engages in difficult, backbreaking agricultural labor, are fairly rigid and fixed. In contrast, among the Aka, gender roles are flexible and net-hunting, foraging and even child care are shared in a traditional matrix. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0250.014
Scholarly communication0.0090.011
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Comparative Family StudiesSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207