Listen, Here Is a Story: Ethnographic Life Narratives from Aka and Ngandu Women of the Congo Basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bonnie L. Hewlett Listen, Here Is a Story: Ethnographic Life Narratives from Aka and Ngandu Women of the Congo Basin. Ithaca, NY: Oxford University Press (2012). 272 pages, ISBN 978-0199764235.An anthropologist engaged in participant observation, Bonnie L. Hewlett's text raises questions about the interdependence and shifting emphases among the Aka and Ngandu peoples in the Congo Basin of the Central African Republic. Her study show how global economics and materialism impact traditional ways of life. In Listen, Here Is a Story: Ethnographic Life Narratives from Aka and Ngandu Women of the Congo Basin, Aka-referred to as Pygmies in many venues, although the term, in my opinion, strikes a pejorative, diminutive note that devalues the culture-and Ngandu women identify themselves and life within their community. explain distinctive interactions. Their stories are practical and profound. The commentaries re-enforce that knowledge of the past-particularly the values of shared production and respect-helps to facilitate a necessary mix of old and new approaches to stave-off critical environmental and social challenges: deforestation, mining gold, the replacement of net-hunting with automatic weaponry-i.e., guns-and relocation from forest to villages.First, two Aka and two Ngandu women, Nali-age not listed, but has a son named to honor Hewlett-and Konga (age 70 or older) as well as Blondine (age 43) and Therese (age 70-75) yrs.) respectively, provide a glimpse of life in the village of Nambele. That the women approached Hewlett and enter into an exchange that teaches the researcher on levels that cannot be ascertained by observations of the two ethnic groups, represents a striking starting point of the text: This story begins one hot afternoon with a knock on my door. Standing in my yard was a group of about eight Ngandu women and Adoxi, my research assistant. They want to talk to you, she said to me, They want you to stop talking to the children and start talking to them(l). Hence, Listen, Here Is a Story, an ethnographic study of Aka and Ngandu women, began.The honesty and forthrightness of the four speakers is notable. Although the brief insertions by the researcher offer anthropological context with respect to terms and seminal work in the field, the technical language jars the reader, after having experienced the direct, frank, conversational style of the informants. Nevertheless, Hewlett presents a necessary overview of the differences between foragers, the Aka and sedentary farmers, the Ngandu as well as how their foci support diverse family structures. Gender divisions among the Ngandu, whose female constituency engages in difficult, backbreaking agricultural labor, are fairly rigid and fixed. In contrast, among the Aka, gender roles are flexible and net-hunting, foraging and even child care are shared in a traditional matrix. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.025 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".