MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long-term outcomes of ruxolitinib (RUX) therapy in patients (pts) with myelofibrosis (MF): 5-year update from COMFORT-I.

2016· article· en· W2510139173 on OpenAlexaff
Vikas Gupta, Srđan Verstovšek, Ruben A. Mesa, Jason Gotlib, John F. DiPersio, John Catalano, Michael W. Deininger, Carole B. Miller, Richard T. Silver, Moshe Talpaz, Elliott F. Winton, Jimmie H. Harvey, Murat O. Arcasoy, Elizabeth O. Hexner, Roger M. Lyons, Ronald Paquette, Azra Raza, Deanna Kornacki, Kang Sun, Hagop M. Kantarjian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRuxolitinibMedicineMyelofibrosisInternal medicineOncologyTerm (time)PediatricsDermatologyBone marrow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7012 Background: The JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor RUX has demonstrated rapid and durable improvements in splenomegaly and symptoms and improved survival in the phase 3 COMFORT studies in pts with MF. Here we report final long-term safety and efficacy results after 5 years (y) of RUX treatment in COMFORT-I. Methods: In COMFORT-I, 309 pts were randomized (1:1) to RUX or placebo (PBO). RUX starting dose was based on baseline platelet count (100–200×109/L: 15 mg BID; > 200×109/L: 20 mg BID). Pts receiving PBO could crossover to RUX after the primary analysis (when all pts completed week [wk] 24 and half completed wk 36) or at any time if they had prespecified worsening of splenomegaly. The primary endpoint was the proportion of pts achieving ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume (SV) at wk 24. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis according to randomized treatment. Results: Median follow-up was 268 wk at the time of this analysis. Of 154 pts randomized to PBO, 111 crossed over to RUX; median time to crossover was 41.1 wk. At wk 24, pts originally randomized to RUX had a mean SV reduction of 31.6%; this was durable for pts who continued on RUX (mean SV reduction at wk 264, 37.6%). Median duration of ≥ 35% SV reduction was 168.3 wk (range, 107.7–NE). OS favored RUX (HR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.96; P= 0.025), with 69 and 82 deaths among pts originally randomized to RUX and PBO, respectively. Median OS has not been reached for RUX. Mean platelet count and Hgb initially decreased through 3 mo. Mean Hgb gradually increased toward baseline. After wk 24, mean Hgb and platelet count generally remain stable through 5 y. New onset grade 3 or 4 anemia was 25.2% for the RUX arm and 26.1% for PBO crossover; grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 12.3% and 13.5% of pts, respectively. Notable AEs included herpes zoster (10.3% and 13.5% of RUX and PBO crossover pts, respectively); basal cell carcinoma (7.7% and 9.0%, respectively); acute myeloid leukemia (5 pts in each arm). Conclusions: After a median follow-up of 268 wk, the hazard ratio for OS favored pts randomized to RUX over those randomized to PBO, and SV reductions were sustained with long-term therapy. Collectively, these data support the durable efficacy and long-term safety of RUX in pts with MF. Clinical trial information: NCT00952289.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207