revista española de pedagogía Universidad Internacional de la Rioja España Año LXXIV, no. 263, enero-abril, 2016
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Currently available for users at the library of the University of Guantanamo is now the issue 263 of the Spanish Magazine of Pedagogy. This magazine is one of the most ancient and exclusive publications of pedagogic investigations in the world. It publishes papers of authors from all countries of the world, provided that they follow its scientific requirements and standards, for more information consult: www.revistadepedagogia.org . It is the first magazine in Spanish subscribed to the Social Sciences Citation Index in the section of education, where almost the totality of the magazines indexed is published in English. It is also included in the Journal Citation Reports / Social Sciences Edition and in the Social Scisearch , and in many other data bases such as SCOPUS and Latindex , which is why it is considered as a Group 1 impact magazine. This number is a monographic edition and its main theme is: Leisure: training and employing young people with social difficulty Some articles of the issue are: Opportunities and challenges : supporting journeys into education for young people leaving care in England Youth empowerment and engagement: an analysis of support practices in the youth protection system in Quebec Quality criteria for an intervention with young people in social difficulty The use of ICTs in leisure and vulnerable youth´s training Analysis of the perception of teachers and families of the values of socially vulnerable youth Attributions of youth in social vulnerability on the benefits of study and employment The leisure of young people in vulnerable situations. Discursive analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.106 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".