New Mineral NamesAntipiniteAnzaite-(Ce)BettertoniteBobshannoniteCalcinaksiteKhvoroviteLeguerniteLukkulaisvaaraiteMinjiangiteMöhniteMoraskoiteNickelpicromeritePilawite-(Ce)RalphcannoniteYeomanite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This New Mineral Names has entries for 15 new minerals, including antipinite, anzaite-(Ce), bettertonite, bobshannonite, calcinaksite, khvorovite, leguernite, lukkulaisvaaraite, minjiangite, mohnite, moraskoite, nickelpicromerite, pilawite-(Ce), ralphcannonite, and yeomanite. # Antipinite* {#article-title-2} N.V. Chukanov, S.M. Aksenov, R.K. Rastsvetaeva, K.A. Lysenko, D.I. Belakovskiy, G. Farber, G. Mohn and K.V. Van (2015) Antipinite, KNa3Cu2(C2O4)4, a new mineral species from a guano deposit at Pabellon de Pica, Chile. Mineralogical Magazine, 79(5), 1111–1121. Antipinite (IMA 2014-027), ideally KNa3Cu2(C2O4)4, was discovered in the guano deposit at the lower part of the northern slope of Pabellon de Pica Mountain, Tarapaca Region, Chile. The new mineral honors Mikhail Yuvenal’evich Antipin (1951–2013), a Russian specialist in the crystallography and crystal chemistry of organometallic and coordination compounds. Antipinite occurs in association with halite, salammoniac, chanabayaite, and joanneumite. The host gabbro consists of amphibole, plagioclase, minor clinochlore, and accessory chalcopyrite. Antipinite forms isometric and short prismatic crystals up to 0.1×0.1×0.15 mm, and random aggregates up to 0.6 mm across. The new mineral is blue, translucent, with pale blue streak and a vitreous luster. It is brittle, with a Mohs hardness ~2. The cleavage is medium in three directions, which were not determined. D meas = 2.53(3) and D calc = 2.549 g/cm3. Antipinite does not fluoresce under UV radiation. It is optically biaxial (+), α = 1.432(2), β = 1.530(2), and γ = 1.698(5) (λ = 589 nm); 2 V meas …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".