A Simplified Geboes Score for Ulcerative Colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The original Geboes Score [OGS] is the most commonly used histological score in ulcerative colitis [UC], but rather complicated to use in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop a Simplified Geboes Score [SGS] and to compare it with the OGS in patients newly diagnosed with UC. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with UC at a tertiary referral centre between 2005 and 2010, who had serial colonoscopies with biopsies, were retrospectively included. The 5-year endoscopic/histological evolution after diagnosis was recorded. Histological activity was scored by an experienced inflammatory bowel disease pathologist and three trained readers using the OGS and also the new SGS that only includes variables linked to active inflammatory disease. The correlation between endoscopic and histological activity and the histological inter-observer agreement were measured. RESULTS: A total of 528 slides from 339 colonoscopies of 103 UC patients were reviewed. Forty [12%] colonoscopies presented Mayo 0, 74 [22%] Mayo 1, 107 [31%] Mayo 2 and 118 [35%] Mayo 3. Active microscopic disease [≥ 3.1 in both scores] was described in 10/40 [25%] patients who were in complete endoscopic remission [Mayo 0], and 62/74 [84%] with mild endoscopic lesions [Mayo 1]. The correlation analysis between endoscopy and OGS/SGS did not show significant differences between the histological scores. The inter-observer agreement was moderate for all the grades of the SGS. CONCLUSIONS: The assessments of histological activity based on the OGS and the SGS were comparable in newly diagnosed active UC patients. Further prospective validation should now be done to replace the OGS with the SGS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".