<i>Camille Saint-Saëns et le politique de 1870 à 1921: Le drapeau et la lyre</i>. By Stéphane Leteuré.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biographies of Camille Saint-Saëns were written during his lifetime by a variety of men: Otto Nietzel (1899), Jean Bonnerot (1914 and 1922), Lucien Augé de Lassus (1914), Jean Montargis (1919), and Arthur Hervey (1921). During the three decades after his death his musical achievements were again assessed by Jean Chantavoine (1947), Watson Lyle (1923), Georges Servières (1923), and Arthur Dandelot (1930). The more recent additions by James Harding (1965), Michael Stegemann (1988), Stephen Studd (1999), Brian Rees (1999), and Jean Gallois (2004) contribute to the multifarious scene. However none has explored the leanings of his political life in great detail. Stéphane Leteuré has undertaken this challenging task with great enthusiasm. The title may have been inspired by Saint-Saëns’s work La Lyre et la harpe. Leteuré presents his story topically rather than chronologically in eight chapters with three levels of headings. Within this work he deals with Saint-Saëns’s intermingling of artistic concerns, political engagements, musical necessities, war efforts, and nationalistic expression as a friend of the ruling class, as an academician, as a journalist, as a world traveller, as the incarnation of a national composer, and as an innovator in several new areas. In his preface to the book Joël-Marie Fauquet notes that Saint-Saëns was curious about everything. Though he defended his freedom of spirit and movement, he never forgot that France was the geocentre of his culture. He was convinced that the future of this culture was reliant on guarding its tradition. With the defeat of 1870 and the establishment of the Third Republic, he assumed a moral responsibility to defend it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".