MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510703262 · doi:10.1002/joc.4881

Association between three prominent climatic teleconnections and precipitation in Iran using wavelet coherence

2016· article· en· W2510703262 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Araghi, Jan Adamowski, Christopher Martinez

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Climatology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeleconnectionClimatologyPrecipitationCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)WaveletEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyGeographyGeologyMathematicsStatisticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Large‐scale climatic teleconnections have noticeable effects on meteorological events in different regions of the world. In this study, the linkages between three major climatic indices, Arctic Oscillation ( AO ), North Atlantic Oscillation ( NAO ) and Southern Oscillation Index ( SOI ), and precipitation in Iran were assessed from 1960 to 2014, at 30 synoptic stations in a time‐frequency space, using wavelet coherence (WCO). The results showed that the SOI is the most effective climatic teleconnection on precipitation in Iran, although the other studied climatic indices have noticeable effects as well. The predominant and effective period of AO on precipitation was equal to or greater than 32 months at most of the stations, while the major effective period of NAO was equal to or greater than 64 months. For the SOI , most parts of the country were affected by a period of less than 64 months, while the predominant period of SOI for the northwestern part of the country was greater than 64 months. A uniform phase difference was not observed between the three studied climatic indices and precipitation in the country; instead the phase differences were usually random. For long‐term periods of SOI , an anti‐phase situation was detected at most of the stations. The study suggested that the WCO is a very powerful and flexible method for studying the relationship between multiple time series in a time–frequency space, and its application in hydrological and meteorological research is expected to increase in the near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ClimatologySame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207