MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510710791 · doi:10.1136/oemed-2016-103951.281

S06-4 Addressing non-radiologic exposures in studies of uranium miners in ontario, canada

2016· article· en· W2510710791 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul A Demers, Garthika Navaranjan, Colin Berriault, Minh Tri Phan, Paul J. Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreCarleton UniversityPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLung cancerMedicineRadonCohortRelative riskEnvironmental healthConfidence intervalCohort studyUraniumSilicosisInternal medicinePathologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We recently completed an extended follow-up of a cohort of 29,000 uranium miners, employed in Ontario (a province in central Canada) mines (1954–1996). The primary objective was to examine the risks of lung cancer associated with radon exposure. However, uranium miners are also potentially exposed to other work-related lung carcinogens and many miners move between different sub-sectors, due to the cyclical nature of the industry. Therefore, we also undertook analyses to examine the potential impact of these factors on the association between radon and lung cancer. During the follow-up period (1954–2007) there were 1230 fatal lung cancers. A strong dose-response was observed with a relative risk (RR) of 2.32 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.72–3.14) for >100 WLM (with 5-year lag). The one departure from a monotonic increase in risk was among very low-exposed workers (RR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.04–1.95 for >0–1 WLM). Forty-seven silicosis deaths were observed in the cohort (SMR = 19.7, 95% CI = 14.5–26.2). One third of the cohort (9,138 miners) had also worked in gold mining, where arsenic exposure is likely, and had increased risks of both silicosis and lung cancer. However, excesses were also observed among uranium miners never employed in gold mining, and among miners from areas with uranium deposits low in silica content. Many mines converted to diesel engines during the study period, but it was more difficult to assess the impact of this exposure on lung cancer without mine-specific exposure data. This study identified a number of potential exposures, including crystalline silica and diesel engine exhaust both within uranium mines and from other sectors, which could potentially distort the relationship between radon and lung cancer. We suspect that these exposures could be responsible for the excess risk of lung cancer observed among low radon exposed miners, but better indicators of exposure are needed to fully assess these relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207