MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

CD19+,CD27+, IgM+ B Cells of Patients with Persistent Polyclonal B Cell (PPBL) Proliferate in a Low Intensity CD40-CD154 Interaction and Show Evidence of Immunoglobulin Isotype Switching

2008· article· en· W2510879407 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Delage, Emmanuelle Dugas-Bourdages, Annie Roy, Sonia Néron, André Darveau

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsHéma-QuébecUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD154CD19BiologyCD40ImmunologyImmunoglobulin class switchingB cellIsotypeImmunoglobulin MMolecular biologyAntibodyImmunoglobulin GGeneticsCytotoxic T cellMonoclonal antibodyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Persistent polyclonal B cell lymphocytosis (PPBL) is a rare disorder characterized by an expansion of memory B cells CD19+, CD27+, IgM+. PPBL occurs mainly in female, is associated with HLA DR7, an increased level of serum IgM and the lymphocytes frequently show a bi-nucleated morphology. The patients have in most cases smoking habits and the clinical evolution is usually benign but we have previously described one case of lymphoma 19 years after a diagnosis of PPBL. Although the pathophysiology remains unknown, a familial occurrence is at the basis of this disorder suggesting a genetic defect. Moreover, multiple bcl-2\Ig gene rearrangements are present in all patients and an extra isochromosome 3 (i3)(q10) is frequently shown in the B cell population. The binding of CD40 to CD154 expressed on activated T cells plays a central role in B cell activation, proliferation and Ig isotype switching. We have previously shown that PPBL B lymphocytes were unable to respond to the proliferative signal delivered in vitro by CD40 in the CD40-CD154 system, indicating a possible defect in the CD40 pathway although CD40 expression, sequencing and tyrosine phosphorylation appeared normal. However, it has been shown recently that a reduced intensity of CD40-CD154 interaction in the presence of IL-2, IL-4 and IL-10 results in the proliferation, expansion and immunoglobulin secretion of normal memory CD19+,CD27+, IgM+ B cells. PPBL B lymphocytes sharing the same phenotype as normal memory B cells, we design a study to investigate the response of B lymphocytes from patient with PPBL in culture in high and low CD154 interaction. Proliferation and flow cytometry analysis of B lymphocytes from 6 patients with PPBL were closely monitored through a 14 day culture period and the Ig secretion was determined by Elisa. Our results show that a low intensity CD40- CD154 interaction in the presence of IL-2, IL-4 and IL-10 induces proliferation of the CD19+,CD27+,IgM+ PPBL population 6 to 20 times higher compared to high CD154 interaction. Interestingly, the CD19+, IgG+ cell population that constitutes less than 5% of the cell population at the beginning of the culture, increased over 25% on day 14. As for normal controls, we observed the emergence of a CD19+,CD27− cell population and the disappearance of surface IgD. Culture of B cells from patients with PPBL resulted in high Ig secretion. Moreover on day 14, Ig isotype analysis showed higher IgG levels compared to IgM. We conclude that PPBL B lymphocytes could proliferate in the CD40- CD154 system under proper condition and that proliferation also results in IgM and IgG secretion indicating an adequate CD40 signalling pathway. Moreover, this report provides the first evidence of in vitro Ig isotype switching of CD19+,CD27+,IgM+ B lymphocytes from PPBL. These results also suggest a possible defect in the interaction with T cells as observed in the hyper-IgM syndrome or alternatively, other cells from the microenvironment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicT-cell and B-cell Immunology→French-language works237,207→