Characterization of Modified Phenol Formaldehyde Resole Resins Synthesized in Situ with Various Boron Compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, three different boron compounds were used together with alkaline catalyst to synthesize phenol formaldehyde (PF) resole resins in situ. The resin curing behavior, molecular structure, bonding performance, and properties of resin-impregnated wood were investigated. Results showed that boron compound-modified PF resins had a lower degree of polymerization than the control PF resin made in the laboratory. The curing kinetics, molecular structure, and functional groups of the modified resins varied depending on the type of boron compounds used. The thermal stability of cured modified PF resins was slightly lower than that of laboratory-made control PF resin. Boron compound-modified PF resins exhibited dry and wet bonding strengths comparable to the those of the laboratory-made control PF resin. Wood impregnated using modified PF resins had comparable dimensional stability, mechanical properties and improved fire resistance than the wood impregnated using lab made control PF resin regardless the type of boron compounds used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".