ANDY WARHOL’S PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND ITS EFFECTS ON HIS WORKS.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The most popular pop artist in America is AndyWarhol, whose artistic experiences are very higher than the usual borders of the painting art borders.He is an artist who, entering the art world, worked in various field such as painting, photography, movies, graphical arts and so on.AndyWarhol's works, after a century quarter of his arising as an artist is 1952 until his death in 1987, were symbols of the consuming culture in the avant-garde methods.His works interfaces between the art and the mass culture.It can be said that AndyWarhol is the embodied form of a star, in whom all creator, introducer and an actor futures are gathered together.But he has an unknown personality, who has been always hidden in the back of a shelter.Despite his successes, he always suffered from an internal fear which was with him until his death time and effected his selected themes.In this article, it has been attempted to investigate his works titles and their relationship with his internal modes.The method of this research is a psychological trend, and the tool method is documental-library.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".