MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2511513298

Elevated cluster take-off level and the risk of dry off in dairy cows

2016· article· en· W2511513298 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hanna Pettersson

Bibliographic record

VenueEpsilon Archive for Student Projects (University of Southampton) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUdderMilkingQuarter (Canadian coin)Animal scienceMilk productionCrossover studyProduction (economics)Cluster (spacecraft)Automatic milkingDairy cattleMathematicsMedicineMastitisBiologyPlaceboComputer scienceLactationGeographyPregnancy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To achieve a profitable milk production in a more and more automated dairy production, well adapted milking equipment and milking routines are essential. Many factors affect the milk production and the possibilities to enhance production. Different settings for take off level in the milking stations is one example. Research has shown that automatic cluster removal (ACR) can be possible to adjust for increased milk production. By increased ACR thresholds on the last milked udder quarter production can be rationalized. However there is a notion that increased ACR threshold increase the risk of drying off that udder quarter due to incomplete milkings. \nThe aim of this study was therefor to examine the risk of drying off an udder quarter by increased ACR threshold on the last milked quarter from 210 g/min to 500 g/min. A crossover design was used on three different farms provided with DeLaval automatic milking equipment (VMS™). Two different treatments were used on 236 dairy cows divided into two even groups on each farm. Treatment A (control) used ACR threshold 210 g/min on all four udder quarters and treatment B (elevated) ACR threshold 210 g/min on the first three milked quarters and 500 g/min on the last milked quarter. The trial proceeded for eight weeks, with treatment A and B interspersed between the two groups the first four weeks. The remaining four weeks one group got treatment A and the other treatment B. Data was automatically recorded in the VMS station and exported to Excel for further analysis in a PROC MIXED model in SAS version 9.4. \nThe effect of treatment on milk yield, milking time and milk flow was analyzed and the results showed no significant difference on milk yield or milk flow between treatments. There was a significant difference in milking time the first four weeks, with longer milking duration for treatment B. No significant treatment effect on milking time could be seen the last four weeks but a shorter milking duration for treatment B could be noted. The results also showed that the last quarter being milked varied between milkings, both between cows and within individual cows. \nTo increase the ACR threshold from 210 g/min to 500 g/min on the last milked udder quarter had no effect on milk yield and showed no risk of drying off a quarter. These results are in line with previous studies and the fact that the last quarter being milked varies, could contribute to decreased risk of incomplete milkings. However, more research would be beneficial to further investigate the effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpsilon Archive for Student Projects (University of Southampton)→Same topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows→French-language works237,207→